EB / News / Management / Time spent on marking impacting classroom time
Time spent on marking impacting classroom time
EB News: 19/04/2016 - 09:43
Two thirds of teachers in the UK claim that they are spending too much time marking which is negatively impacting their teaching time.
New research, by Canvas, has revealed that 17 per cent of teachers in the UK are spending more than 11 hours a week on marking and assessments. As part of an international study collating results from surveys covering 3,328 primary and secondary teachers in the UK, Denmark, Norway, Sweden, Brazil, the US and Australia, the report shows that the 11 hours is considerably more than those in the US (nine per cent) and Australia (seven per cent) where the time spent on teaching is typically higher.
Additionally, 68 per cent of UK teachers said the amount of time they spent marking impacted negatively on classroom time with pupils, with a high proportion stating the situation had worsened over the last five years, with assessment tracking, Ofsted inspections and benchmarking being cited as the main reasons.
Samantha Blyth, director of schools at Canvas, said: “There is no doubt that teachers in the UK do a fantastic job of multitasking; juggling marking, reporting and lesson planning, with face-to-face teaching in the classroom. But there is a growing perception that the sheer amount of admin is leaving them unable to do the job they love – to actually teach their students.”
Ofsted has shared findings from pilot inspections carried out in 115 schools this autumn, ahead of the full rollout of its renewed inspection framework.
The TV, radio and multi media campaign deals with the root causes of absences and identifies ways to approach conversations about wellbeing that can help pupils to improve their attendance.
The government will publish a new set of enrichment benchmarks, with schools asked to ensure every child has access to activities across five categories of enrichment.
The policy introduces the new Chief Regulator’s Rebuke - a new tool which can be used when an awarding organisation is found to have breached rules, but not in a way that warrants a financial penalty.